Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2931b9a8b5bc77b

Jump to content

Talk:Normalization principle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Half sentient frog in topic Misconceptions section

Untitled

[edit]

Normalization (not Normalisation)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lorenapreston.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Criticism

[edit]

I was hoping to read some criticism of the idea, which I'm sure exist; but I don't know the field well enough myself. Can anyone update the entry with such information? 96.49.46.198 (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at Social model of disability. It looks to like this concept is simply the process of acting upon the consequences of accepting the Social model of disability - i.e. once the Social model is accepted Normalisation is the logical consequence. Strangely this article didn't even have links to either the Social model of disability or the Medical model of disability articles until I inserted them a few minutes ago. Roger (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Definition of normalization

[edit]

I was wondering if any of the first paragraph of this definition of normalization is a direct quote because it reads like one. If not I would like to make an edit to it. Is this a direct quote?  Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattokamagic (talkcontribs) 20:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mattokamagic, the first sentence is marked as a direct quote and referenced, so better not to edit that part. Rather add your edit elsewhere in the lead paragraph, and don't forget to cite your source. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Misconceptions

[edit]

Can someone change this section to either list misconceptions (like mentioned) or change the title completely to summarise the topic. It doesn't make sense.

title

[edit]

Idk if to be changed to "(disabled people)" or "(disability)"

--Luhanopi (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's what I was thinking. Anthony2106 (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 16 April 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (Give me 24h). (non-admin closure) Valorrr (lets chat) 19:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply


Normalization (people with disabilities) ? – The disability page uses more Identity-first language then person-first language and I think it sounds much better. But it could also be (disability) as well witch would be a good middle ground. Anthony2106 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)  Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 12:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)  Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 16:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Misconceptions section

[edit]

This section needs a lot of cleanup - it's written like a term paper. I added messages at the top of the section but do not have time to edit it right now. Half sentient frog (talk) 02:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply