Talk:Norkom
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Nyseans in topic Sources
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources
[edit]Any claims about how Norkom sizes up against its competition need to be well-sourced by reliable third-parties. Gartner is a good one. I have dug up a few others for the other statements, but as they are non-notable (i.e. don't have their own articles), I'm not sure they meet WP:RS . Steve CarlsonTalk 07:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The Celent quote does not have a valid reference. It should be removed or updated. --Nyseans (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Stub-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- Stub-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Ireland
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Stub-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles

