Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253bcc8fbac3cd0

Jump to content

Talk:Nook HD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Comp.arch in topic Nook HD model is interlaced

Combining the two Nook HD pages

[edit]

Since the Nook HD was been discontinued, should the Nook HD and HD+ pages be combined? As an example, the Kindle Fire HD is one page and also has two screen sizes.

Nook HD discontinuance rumors

[edit]

The Nook HD discontinuance rumors will not be posted to this page until they are confirmed that they are, indeed, discontinuing the line and we have exact details of which models will remain in production. --KJRehberg (talk) 02:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unit pricing?

[edit]

Shouldn't the original prices be listed at the beginning of the information rather than the later discounted prices? Shouldn't it also indicate that these are US prices?

HD 8G $199US; HD 16G $229US; HD+ 16G $269US; HD+ 32G $299US

Nook HD model is interlaced

[edit]

The Nook HD model is interlaced 1440x900i. The HD+ is 1920x1280 progressive. --KJRehberg (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I missed this and changed back to 1440x900 since I thought 1440x900i to be obviously false. Had done before a long time ago and Googled it at the time. See: [] Says: "1440 x 900 pixel resolution" no "i" (and "Displays 720p"). I could google one result that says otherwise but everyone else doesn't say that. Do you have other sources that confirm this or confirmation from a Barnes and Noble spec? It could be theoretically true I guess. comp.arch (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Reply