Talk:Noble Beast
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Mike harkin in topic Professional review suggestion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Genre
[edit]Writing the genre before the album is released and with only one track available for preview is pure speculation. 79.114.169.146 (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Is there a way to mark that it is? Or should it just be removed? Banjaloupe (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- It's been leaked. Genre isn't necessarily speculation anymore, and the leak should potentially be noted, although I'm not sure of its origins. 98.220.214.217 (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Professional review suggestion
[edit]As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review of Andrew Bird's Noble Beast. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable)
Mike harkin (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hi there, thanks for the heads up! I think reviews might need to have a score at the end, but I'm not sure of the rules about it. Hopefully someone else will stop by and let us know...*hint hint* Banjaloupe (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Banjaloupe, reviews do not necessarily need a numerical or star score--they can be considered "favorable," "mixed," or "negative." In this case, the review is favorable. Mike harkin (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)