Talk:Nick Fowler
Add topicLatest comment: 16 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Nick Russell Fowler → Nick Fowler — Reason for move: Nick Fowler's publicist requests that his title page name be changed because the current listing on wikipedia does not show up when searched on google. Thus his publicist has asked that this page be retitled Nick Fowler. Thank you for your time and assistance in regard to this request. Relisted to avoid confusion during Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Talamasca67 (talk) 05:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Support – eminently sensible move, totally consistent with WP:COMMONNAME — Hebrides (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support, common name and in accordance with WP:BLP. Andrewa (talk) 21:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support, logical move in that it is his professional name in his literary writings WP:COMMONNAME. clwareham (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support that's what the book title said. Hekerui (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.