Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a224e931a832f49c

Jump to content

Talk:Next Generation EU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Ramiro Echeverría in topic About the use of PIGS

Recovery fund: Own article needed

[edit]

Now that we all look on coalition break in Italy it is time to make the Recovery fund an own article, am I right? The question I wanted to have answered was:

What are the concrete constraints for a country using money of it? I wanted to compare them to the constraints for the ESM as Matteo Renzi gave that comparison as reason.

I think there is (besides maybe what words are used in the media) no reasons why there is a german article about it:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiederaufbaufonds_(EU)

while in the german Wikipedia we do not yet have an article about the Next_Generation_EU ! --78.35.168.183 (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Misleading sentence about the EU refusing to help Italy and the virus spreading from Lombardy to the rest of Europe

[edit]

Hello, There are several problems with the sentence: "EU member states reacted unilaterally and refused to come to Italy's assistance to fight the massive virus outbreak in Lombardy eventually causing its spread across Europe." 1) It is misleading on a political level. Things were not so simple. 2) It is misleading in suggesting that Lombardy contaminated the rest of Europe. 3) the quoted article provides is not a solid evidence for such bold 8and highly innacurate) claims  Preceding unsigned comment added by Posillipo200 (talkcontribs) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dreaming about fiscal integration

[edit]

@Clemens Schmillen: You write that the NGEU is "considered the first step into a fiscal integration in Europe". Where in the cited source is that stated?--Anders Feder (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Rule of Law Section

[edit]

Sounds very much like a loose essay rather than a Wikipedia entry. 213.134.186.180 (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

...and it's not really up to date. 213.134.186.180 (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

About the use of PIGS

[edit]

I don't think it's appropriate to use the term "pigs" when talking about Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain. It's a derogatory term, and some people consider it racist because it portrays southern Europeans as lazy. Ramiro Echeverría (talk) 08:47, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply