Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22510abc98a3524

Jump to content

Talk:Newspaper format

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Thirstyice in topic Weight per area?

Weight per area?

[edit]

An average roll of 26.4 lb (12.0 kg), 45 in (110 cm) diameter newsprint rolled out is 9.7 mi (15.6 km) long. This needs clarification. The weight can't be right. Is it a weight per area, and in that case, what area? --Janke | Talk 06:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would imagine that it's referring to the basis weight, which according to Grammage is the weight in pounds of 500 24x36 inch sheets for newsprint. The conversion to kg is not the correct conversion here, and was not added by the original author of this line. (Original line added: , conversion added: ). The correct conversion would be to gsm, with the equivalent value being approximately 43gsm.
Even knowing that though, it's still not a super clear or (in my opinion) helpful set of dimensions to list.
The more recent edit changing the wording to An average roll of 26.4 in (670 mm), 45 in (1,100 mm) diameter newsprint rolled out is 60 - 65 cm long is, as far as I can tell, a complete fabrication which does not hold up to even a moment's scrutiny. I cannot conceive of a way that unrolling a 45 in (110 cm) diameter roll of material would result in 60–65 cm (24–26 in) of material. Thirstyice (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Format of The Guardian

[edit]

I changed the tense used when referring to The Guardian; it is no longer a Berliner. I did not delete the line because the reference was interesting. A newspaper subject matter expert may have a different view and may wish to remove the line altogether. Jim (talk) 22:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply