Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2263015393bf41a

Jump to content

Talk:Newick format

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Quantling in topic Branch Length Units

Leaf Names

[edit]

Is it mandatory for the leaves to have names in Newick format? The example list includes a tree with no node names at all, but this seems to violate the grammar given below it. (Unless the terminal "name" can also be an empty string.) 2001:DF0:0:2006:1A03:73FF:FEDC:2A06 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the terminal Name can also be empty.—Quantling (talk | contribs) 21:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Branch Length Units

[edit]

The branch lengths supplied in Newick format, what are their units? Vegar Ottesen 14:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is not specified. I have seen years (or megayears, etc.). I have seen the number of mutations a position of junk DNA will have undergone on average. Perhaps there are other possibilities. —Quantling (talk | contribs) 17:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

dnd extension

[edit]

I'm wondering if anyone can make a statement on the main page on why it is so common to have a DND extension for Newick trees.--158.111.4.53 (talk) 15:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Extended Newick

[edit]

The phylogenetic networks page mentions that there is an extended version of the Newick format for phylogenetic networks. Is it reasonable to add that on this page, or should it get its own page? RemJanssen (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Branch Length on leaf nodes

[edit]

If I'm reading the grammar correctly, it allows length on Internal nodes but not on Leaf notes. But this seems incorrect, since leaf nodes can have lengths, and do in several of the examples (e.g. "(A:0.1,B:0.2,(C:0.3,D:0.4):0.5);").

Instead of 'Leaf → Name', should it be 'Leaf → Name Length'? David Ebbo (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The grammar in http://scikit-bio.org/docs/0.2.2/generated/skbio.io.newick.html appears more correct and does not have this issue. David Ebbo (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps the tokens should be renamed to make this clearer? An expression such as "A:0.1" is a branch (that has a length 0.1 and leads to a node that is a leaf named "A"). —Quantling (talk | contribs) 16:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply