Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ad6f0fe5f1ec6

Jump to content

Talk:New Protection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by TarnishedPath in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • Source: "There was a major link between the two areas of tariff protection and wage protection in Alfred
Deakin’s New Protection Policy of 1906. The link took the form of measures to try to ensure that the producers who received protection paid fair and reasonable wages to their employees. [...] New Protection Policy had a further major influence on the hugely important 1907 Harvester Judgment of the newly created Court of Conciliation and Arbitration. This Judgment converted the abstract notion in New Protection of a 'fair and reasonable wage' into an operational statistically determined 'living wage'." (Lloyd 2017,
Moved to mainspace by ITBF (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 26 past nominations.

I T B F 📢 07:23, 29 March 2026 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article was moved to mainspace on 22 March which is within the 7-day window and is long enough at 5247 B. QPQ has been provided. I found no issues with copyright, sourcing, or neutrality. The hook is interesting and supported by the source. Nice job on the article! MCE89 (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply