Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24b79df38cccf3f

Jump to content

Talk:New Labor Forum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Lincolnite in topic Notability concerns

Notability concerns

[edit]

I addressed the notability and third-party references concerns in a couple of ways. First, I linked to some of the names of authors who recently published in the journal. Notable people writing for the journal should help to establish notability. Second, I added the names of some of the editors of the journal. Notable people on the editorial board should also help establish notability. Third, I added citations showing how the journal has played a major role in a well-known (within the labor studies community, anyway) and controversial labor studies conference, how notable new authors are playing up their participation in the journal, and the opinion of at least one editor of a major political magazine (vanden Heuvel at The Nation) considers the journal important. Lastly, I also cleaned up the article, restoring the categorization and removing much of the advertising-like language. The addition of citations and notability should raise the article to Start class for the Organized Labour Project. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you've done an excellent job of cleaning it up and establishing its notability. Great work. Thank you. — Lincolnite (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply