Talk:Network Performance Monitoring Solution

Generic discussion or product-specific?

The title of the article leads one to believe that it addresses the general concept of a network performance monitoring solution, but it is written as if it's the specific implementation of a network performance monitoring solution. Yet, the associated company is never really mentioned. The article should be written in a fashion similar to service assurance or operations support system which describe general capabilities and use cases. ktrueman (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Agreed, and at the moment the article makes only a weak assertion of notability per WP:PRODUCT. It's a minor component of Microsoft OMS, which itself isn't particularly notable, and Microsoft has just begun merging OMS into the Microsoft Azure portal.

There's really nothing here worth merging to an article on network performance monitoring, or to Network monitoring. The product's probably worth a mention at the Azure article, though the current title isn't suitable for redirecting there. Might I suggest moving it back to draft? It's not ready for main space in its current state. Donutron (talk) 20:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

So it is a Microsoft product. I don't see why it could not be thinned and merged into Microsoft_Azure#Services ~Kvng (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

This might not even exist anymore, I checked the Microsoft Azure website and all I saw were sections from other articles about similar functionality. 22jcampb (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC)