Talk:Neterion
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Actualcpscm in topic Notability
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
[edit]Hi User:Hughesdarren! I saw that you tagged this with the notability template. I agree that this is probably not a highly influential firm, but with 6 sources providing coverage of this company, I think WP:NCORP is met. Thoughts? Actualcpscm (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there @Actualcpscm: The five references are good (1 and 3 are the same?), none were in any depth about Neterion, the first three were about the predecessor and they all read like like passing mentions to me. I wasn't prepared to commit to reviewing it through to the mainspace just yet and put the tags on so it is in my watchlist to check on later. You can remove the tag if you like, another reviewer might send it through as is. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think coverage of its predecesssor is relevant with regards to notability, as it was basically just a rebrand (and not a corporate restructuring or acquisition). I disagree with your evaluation of notability on this, but I won't remove the tag; it's a very legitimate concern. Thanks for taking the time to reply! Actualcpscm (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi again! I rewrote this article to remove original research and include relevant information from reliable sources. I don't expect it to grow beyond a stub, but that's fine. Happy editing!