Talk:Nerva

Pisonian conspiracy

It is written that he played a vital part in exposing the Pisonian conspiracy of 65. Tacitus, Annales, Book XV,48 says consul Silius Nerva. Nerva was no consul in 65, it was A. Licinius Nerva Silianus (January–June) together with Marcus Julius Vestinus Atticus (see List of Roman consuls). Is it possible that there is confusion ? (Peluba (talk) 09:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC))

Death date

The lede and the infobox say 27 January, but the text says 28 January with 2 sources. Which is correct? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 00:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Statue of Nerva

I've added Statue of Nerva as a See also link, if anyone's aware of a better way to fold into the article body. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 12:47, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Nerva

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Issues appear to have been addressed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:08, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Min968 (talk) 09:59, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sources available. I previously saved GA on the Flavian Dynasty. I am already lined up to work on Washington Crossing the Delaware and have a few other military history project responsibilities to catch up on first. Donner60 (talk) 11:24, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@Min968: Unfortunately, I will need a little more additional time than I thought I would to finish this task. I have added this to my user and user talk page: "I will be offline for most, perhaps all days, from June 3 to June 12. I hope to catch up on some lingering tasks and keep up with others before then. RL has not given me much time lately. I will comment further on my return. All I think I should say now is that if my return is much delayed, you will not be wrong in assuming that I have encountered a problem. No need for me to elaborate unnecessarily now since a problem may well not arise." I will be finishing up Washington Crossing the Delaware and catching up on a few other tasks upon my likely return on June 12. I have started on Washington Crossing the Delaware and am confident I can finish that and some other backlogged tasks upon my expected return. As I noted, I think that I have the sources available which can be cited to save the GA for this article later this month. Thank you for your patience. Donner60 (talk) 05:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Donner60 This can stay on hold for four weeks. Min968 (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Min968, Bgsu98, and Z1720: I have added the citations that appeared to be necessary and a few others. As I noted earlier, the article is not too long. I did delete one sentence which I could not verify and which I think is probably obsolete due to recent archaeological and restoration work. It is not a necessary sentence in any event. I should note that the citations at the end of a few quotations serve to verify the preceding introductory paragraph. I can repeat them before the quotation if deemed necessary. (I would not do that in evaluating whether an article meets military history project B-class criteria but if necessary for GA, I can add these.) I think this is now ready to be kept. I also note that I will be offline for several days after early tomorrow UTC. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:54, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.