Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2292174cffdcac0

Jump to content

Talk:Nernst effect

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 2001:16B8:2C7E:9A00:743E:E2E7:301F:5D77 in topic Ettingshausen effect is not a synonyme for the second Nernst–Ettingshausen effect

The article could still use a list of some typical Nernst coefficients for frequently-encountered materials, but I will now get back to work. Y!qtr9f 10:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Whoever knows more about this: This article linked to Ettingshausen effect, which was (at the time) redlinked. But there was also already an article called Ettinghausen effect (note the missing "s"). Google search showed roughly the same count for each search term, and I don't know which spelling is the correct one. I have redirected the former link to the latter article. Fix this if you know the right spelling. sgeureka tc 10:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ettingshausen effect is not a synonyme for the second Nernst–Ettingshausen effect

[edit]

The inverse of the first Nernst–Ettingshausen effect ist indeed the Ettingshausen effect, but the Ettingshausen effect is not a synonyme for the second Nernst–Ettingshausen effect. The latter one is similar to the first Nernst–Ettingshausen, but the temparatur gradient is parallel to the electrical field.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:2C7E:9A00:743E:E2E7:301F:5D77 (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply