Talk:Neosexism
Add topic| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Criticism needed?
[edit]This term is an essence of feminist demagogy and verbal gymnastics: even absence of sexism or sexism against men (example 3) is sexism against women. And original: another form of misogyny. Orwell would appreciate.
Everywhere else, a perfectly normal and legitimate practice, i.e. demanding evidence for some of my claims (i.e. that discrimination exists), is in case of feminism sexism. No kidding. 93.153.87.247 (talk) 08:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- See also Danish version. 93.153.87.247 (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Whose idea is it?
[edit]Should WP make the assertions that neosexism is what the article says it is, or should it attribute that viewpoint to Tougas? Who is Tougas, anyway? --Uncle Ed (talk) 03:55, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Discrimination articles
- Unknown-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- Stub-Class Feminism articles
- Unknown-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Stub-Class Gender studies articles
- Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles