Talk:Neonympha mitchellii

Replaced all article text

A couple years ago, someone changed the opening of the article to be about the subspecies N. m. mitchellii, presumably because there was already quite a nice article on N. m. francisci. However, the title of this article is Neonympha mitchellii, which is a species; shifting the topic almost exclusively to one subspecies, even if it's the nominate subspecies, doesn't seem appropriate. A separate article titled Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii or Mitchell's satyr could be created for that, and is a good idea if someone wants to go into more detail (e.g. history, habitat and food information specific to N. m. mitchellii).

I kept the great taxobox, but scrapped virtually all the text of the previous version of the article. It's pretty light on details now, but it's a start, and it uses inline citations for everything, which will hopefully make future expansion and alterations easier.

Agyle (talk) 10:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Recipes

I've noticed that some charlatan keeps logging on to pages about rare butterflies and adding "recipes", often calling for 1 pound or more of endangered butterflies. (In many cases, that's more than the existing population of the species.) Is there any way we can lock all butterfly articles from editing? This is completely malicious behavior, let alone dangerous. Most species of butterflies are toxic to humans when consumed, and we certainly wouldn't want someone to go decimate an entire population just kill themselves eating one of these insane recipes.

Thanks!

- Gil Huffner Public Outreach Coordinator International Butterfly Coalition GilHuffner@ButterflyCoalition.Org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.155.200.103 (talk) 18:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)