Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2332cdb6cc74afc

Jump to content

Talk:Neon Icon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Funkatastic in topic Video track

Video track

[edit]

Youtube.com and maddecent.merchtable.com must not be used as a source. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 06:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

And what qualifies you to say so? I'll cut the crap and tell you that you're not qualified to say so. So how about instead of trying to pretend you have the authority to say as you please, how about give some reasoning to your statements and help make constructive edits. Funkatastic (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes they are not reliable sources for claiming this sort of biographical material. Youtube is clearly self-published and anyone can write, maddecent.merchtable is an shopping site. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 01:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes, anybody can post on Youtube. Which is what this artist did! Wikipedia allows for the use of social media as a reference. And yes, Mad Decent Merchtable is a shopping site. It's the official merchandise site for the Mad Decent record label. It is the only website in which the vinyl edition of the album can be purchased and it contains information on a bonus track exclusive to the vinyl that is relevant to the track list section of this page. Funkatastic (talk) 01:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Neon Icon is his 2nd release, and you are still changing it to debut. Your Youtube links are linking to copyrighted material, see WP:YOUTUBE. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 01:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
You people continually refer to Neon Icon as his "second studio album" while The Golden Alien had no studio/label involvement whatsoever. It was released entirely independently and yet we're still referring to Neon Icon as his second studio album even though not a single person has done anything to prove it's not the debut other than simply saying "The Golden Alien was his debut". Funkatastic (talk) 05:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply