Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27f1d71bf19b23b

Jump to content

Talk:Neofeminism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Augmented Seventh in topic Definition

Cultural feminism

[edit]

How is this different from cultural feminism? Gmsrubin (talk) 04:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cultural feminism advocates for a feminine nature which is superior, while neofeminism advocates for the celebration of feminine attributes along with other qualities. Panmodern (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Definition

[edit]

I'm proposing the following edits to this article. What would I be missing to add this context to the first paragraph?

It advocates that women should realize their autonomy through their femininity. Neofeminism advocates for the autonomy of women in making decisions regarding their physical appearance, lifestyle choices, and sexual orientation. [1] Neofeminism embraces intersectionality and challenges traditional gender norms and advocates that the gender binary is a social construct. [2][3]

  1. Rylander, Jessica (2025-06-06). "Beyoncé and the Neo-Feminist Movement Part 1 – How the Popular Songstress Influences Public Policy and Positive Social Change Through the Celebration of Female Empowerment". PA TIMES Online. Retrieved 2025-07-29.
  2. "Neo-Feminism". Dr. P-J. Retrieved 2025-07-29.
  3. Foundation, P. F. E. (2025-05-11). "Women's safety and the excesses of neo-feminism". Patriotes pour l'Europe | Fondation politique européenne. Retrieved 2025-07-29.

Panmodern (talk) 21:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

These seem like reasonable sources. 2600:1014:B0A8:A0C1:ED40:AF8B:CE4F:11A5 (talk) 22:46, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The suggested edits will include historical examples of the use of the term. Newer sources won't negate or erase previous content except as needed for article flow and formatting.
The lead will reflect consensus.
And please see: wp:sock puppet if you find the time. Augmented Seventh🎱 23:22, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Do you believe that these additions will negate or erase previous content? I did not mention replacing or removing content, but maybe I’m missing your meaning. I’m also not following your comment “The lead will reflect consensus” Panmodern (talk) 23:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
There's a tendency for articles that gain cultural relevance to drift away from the original academic-based content, and towards social media content, opinions, and pdf. Augmented Seventh🎱 01:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

[edit]

This really should be moved into Third-wave feminism. They are the same thing.  Preceding unsigned comment added by OhWhyNot (talkcontribs) 16:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

For further discussion, see Talk:Third-wave feminism#Merger Proposal. --Bejnar (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply