Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@User:Gnomingstuff, can you please elaborate on the maintenance tag so I can fix any perceived problems. I double checked and the sources all look correct, I'm not sure what part of the writing is setting off the alarm bells. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 03:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sure. A lot of the stuff from the original version has been removed, but statements like providing insights into the intricate interplay between individuals and their surrounding environment are still the kind of non-neutral analysis that AI tends to generate and that go against WP:OR as the "analysis" is disconnected from the source. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ah okay. I wrote this based on notes I took during one of her awards talks at AAG and some literature review from my comprehensive exams. I think the wording is reflective of that, I think tagging things as "tone" or "original research" is probably better then the AI tag. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 17:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's been a few years, so I'm really not sure. I use Grammarly quite a bit for basic spell check, and at the time I was experimenting with running my writing through AI to improve wording (it was a new tool my advisors had instructed me to explore), so it is definitely possible. It ended up being more trouble than it was worth, but the workflow involved me writing something, then seeing whether it could be improved while maintaining the same meaning. The core content was based on citations, and citations were hunted down the old-fashioned way (AI can't really get them anyway). I did this in a writing circle under my advisor's direction after I finished comps; she had me rewrite some of my answers with AI intentionally to see how it performed, so I definitely could have used it here, but I'm not sure. I've gone over the page a few times, and the content is verifiable; AI would have been limited to minor word choice and sentence structure. The fact that it was detected makes me think I likely used it a bit here, but if so, I don't think it was significant. I've since manually reworded the sentences that were pointed out as offensive. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 06:49, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
