Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a294735a0f8bc77b

Jump to content

Talk:Ned Lamont

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2603:6080:2104:8C5F:C06E:A0B0:B4CD:574A in topic Outdated Information
Former good articleNed Lamont was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 5, 2013Good article nomineeListed
November 14, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Is "perennial candidate" editorializing?

[edit]

In the first sentence. It seems derogatory, but I'm not sure what it should say instead. Salelder (talk) 02:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

He's run in three elections (including the current gubernatorial election) over the last 12 years. Considering the numerous elections that have taken place over that timespan (both federal and state), three hardly seems "perennial" to me. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2018

[edit]

Change Lamont's status as Democratic nominee to Democratic governor-elect, his opponent conceded to him. Shazzio (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DannyS712 (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2018

[edit]

Change the information under the heading '2018 Connecticut gubernatorial election' to reflect the results of the election (Lamont defeated Stefanowski) Shazzio (talk) 15:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DannyS712 (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Naming

[edit]

I think we should settle the issue of whether to have "Ned" included in the lede section. I know it's been omitted before because of the Manual of Style, but I feel like that really only applies to cases where the nickname is obvious (i.e. Tommy = Thomas, Nick = Nicholas, Kathy = Katherine, etc.).

Other Neds have had the clarifications in their lede section: Edward Almond, Ned Martin, Ned Davis (politician), to name a few. So I'm not sure why this article should be any different. Woko Sapien (talk) 04:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Woko Sapien, ."Ned" is a common hypocorism. MOS:NICKNAME is the specific guidance for this issue. It says not to include hypocorisma. Those pages you listed are wrong. Thank you for pointing them out because we can correct them.  Muboshgu (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Muboshgu: That's fair enough. Still, random editors have occasionally tried to add his nickname to the opening sentence in the past (I'm certain in good faith). I've added a separate sentence to the lede with a source that should hopefully settle the issue for good. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Calidum: "Ned" is a common hypocorism for names like "Edward". It's so common that they use it in Westeros.  Muboshgu (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reference provided does not mention claim in Early Political Career.

[edit]

Under the section "early political career", the claim "During his term as chair, the state saw its unfunded liabilities reduced and pension fund performance improved" the reference (27) does not mention anything to backup this statement. Request edit to remove that statement without factual reference. Jonshef (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I went ahead and removed the unfounded claim (seemed like original research). I've also added an additional source to confirm the existing information there. --Woko Sapien (talk) 17:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. charlotte 👸♥ 13:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA from 2013. There are uncited paragraphs and the article itself might need to be updated. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Outdated Information

[edit]

It says “incumbent” Joe lieberman when Joe lieberman left senate office in 2013 2603:6080:2100:D12B:48C:2727:6DD3:7FB5 (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources: https://www.politico.com/story/2011/01/lieberman-bows-out-wont-run-in-2012-047823 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/wbna41142447 also Wikipedia article says he left office in 2013 2603:6080:2104:8C5F:5880:BF4:AEC7:5B4 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
He was the incumbent at the time that Lamont ran in 2006, and so this is accurate. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 23:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh i am stupid 2603:6080:2104:8C5F:C06E:A0B0:B4CD:574A (talk) 01:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply