Talk:Nazi morality
Add topic| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
@Luizpuodzius: Querendo traduzir é só falar. att 2804:14C:5BB3:8BED:9135:4048:DE8E:875F (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- It has been done (Foi feito) - AQUI Dr. LooTalk to me 19:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
| On 11 February 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved to Nazi ethics. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 9 February 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 22:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Nazi morality → Nazi ethics – or fascist ethics– "Nazi ethics" has several advantages: it's more concise, it's consistent and it more fully defines the scope of the article. @Bearian and Luizpuodzius:. Mariana de moraes silveira (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- Comment, on Google Scholar
"nazi morality"
gets 495 hits while"nazi ethics"
gets 258 hits. I guess it's consistent with Islamic ethics, Christian ethics, Buddhist ethics, and Jewish ethics, but those are all religions. Kowal2701 (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- Support. This is a more academic title and is therefore better for an encyclopedia article. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose the article and its sources are explicitly about morality, not ethics—these are not synonymous and one is not "more encyclopedic" than the other. (t · c) buIdhe 04:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- marxist ethics and feminist ethics are enough? Mariana de moraes silveira (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Buidhe, @Kowal2701, @Rreagan007 this was initiated by an LTA sock so should probably should be closed. S0091 (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2026 (UTC)