Talk:Naturalization of intentionality

Philosophy: Mind / Language / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind
	Philosophy of language
	Contemporary philosophy

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

bad

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is really, really bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.135.115 (talk) 05:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Added an it inside a quote

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just added an "it" inside a quote. I will not remove it now, because I feel it is such an obvious mistake that I feel it was probably part of the original quote. Nevertheless, it would be great if someone could check it! Jergas (talk) 03:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Naturalization of intentionality

bad

Added an it inside a quote