Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22812efc9cca140

Jump to content

Talk:Natural deduction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tule-hog in topic Introduction and elimination

PBC?

[edit]

In the section "Gentzen-style inference rules", rules are listed. The last one has a caption "PBC". It's the first time for me to find it for one of the basic inference rules.
Is this usage correct? It's the term "RAA" I expected.
I know "RBC" is abbrv. of "Rule by Cases", but it should be fit to ∨-elim, which appears to be unnatural for selection of only two propositions. Masuo64 (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction and elimination

[edit]

There was once a #Introduction and elimination section which served as a destination for Elimination rule and Introduction rule.

The current article does not really highlight this significant feature of natural deduction, although it is of course implicit in the elaborations. It would be worth a condensed explanation, especially to serve as a target for these subtopics. Tule-hog (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply