Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c01655e6eaea1

Jump to content

Talk:Nanocell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Michael Powerhouse

The abbreviation for units used to describe the size of nanocells, _m, does not appear to be of a standard form. It is the syntactically correct abbreviation for meter on Texas Instrument's Ti-89 calculators, but I have not seen it in a non-Texas Instruments context. Certainly, a scale of meters is incorrect in the context of nanocells, based on applications of the technology. I assume that the author means nanometer, but since I have been unable to verify the scale of nanocells, I have not edited the article. The correct abbreviation for nanometer is nm (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meter#SI_prefixed_forms_of_metre).

I had the same question / was wondering about the same issue. I wonder if anyone on here knows the answer. It just looked odd - "50 _m in diameter". Thanks. --Michael Powerhouse (talk) 20:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply