Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2646cecbdf8cdd8

Jump to content

Talk:Nancy 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Robster1983 in topic Neutrality of the article, part II

Neutrality of the article

[edit]

I'm sorry, but this article has almost no sources, and is, in fact, one giant celebration to, and a fan page for Nancy Ajram. I've added the clean up label because of all this. Robster1983 (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality of the article, part II

[edit]

More sources and a way more neutral style of writing is needed. Sections needing clean-up/different style of writing are:

1. Development and release: No sources added whatsoever.
2. Composition and musical styles: No sources have been added whatsoever.
3. Promotion: Seems as if the promotion continues on this page. Of course Nancy's manager says that something is "the best music video we've shot yet." I would drop the following line: Contrary to the lead single, "Sheikh El Shabab" has a comical music video which her manager described as "the best music video we've shot yet."
4. Rumors: Such sections are dicey to begin with here on Wikipedia, and are most of the times removed, for Wikipedia is not a gossip magazine. And naming a subsection Rumors, here, on Wikipedia, is just like (knowingly or without intent) plunging in open water with a big open wound in front of a great white shark: both don't stand a chance. However, if sources can be found, then maybe someone could add it to/blend it with the subsection of Development and release? Otherwise it's best to be removed.

Other than that, I also must say: kudos to all the people who put effort in the article adding all them sources, it really improved!! Again big kudos!!! :) Robster1983 (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply