Talk:NSB Class 64

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:NSB Class 64/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is reasonably well written. I made some copy-edits for gammar and clarity.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I assume good faith for off-line sources, which appear reliable. No evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail and focus

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used, licensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This article sufficiently meets the criteria so I am happy to list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

   Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)