Talk:NOOMA
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
switched the titles for upcoming nooma 19 and 20. 19 is called Name (http://www.nooma.com/Info/News.aspx?id=39), so I assume 20 is called Shells (what 19 was originally marked as.) Citation needed. Also changed the formating of the soundtrack/music section fixing an error caused by mixing the | of the table and the | in the name of the NOOMA videos. Just added trailer link, as well as info on the music from that trailer.
Company Name Change
[edit]i changed the company name to flannel. flannel is the non-profit company, nooma is the product. --divinevelocity 04:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC) ahem, again. --divinevelocity 03:55, 06 September 2007 (UTC)
I changed the introduction to give better understanding that Flannel is the company producing Nooma. Feel free to edit if you have a better way of doing it : ) --rob3r —Preceding comment was added at 20:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Possible Future Noomas
[edit]According to the Nooma Facebook group, they are shooting an upcoming film called 'She':
I'm not sure if this is just speculation as I've heard no official word other than this picture. Should this be added to the page in a tentative state or left until further confirmation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoelCornah (talk • contribs) 12:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Release dates
[edit]It would be nice to have the release dates for all of the Nooma's. Maybe I'll get inspired when I get out of work :) --rob3r these videos are awesome - i can't believe wikipedia is considering deleting it! the videos reflect how to live a better life and how to look at events that happen to us. Jesus lived a perfect life and we can live a better life by learning how to be like Him. bkent —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bktours (talk • contribs) 02:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Declined Proposed Deletion
[edit]The proposed deletion of this article was declined. The concern was "Per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Non-commercial_organizations and Wikipedia:Notability (films) - notability not established, no secondary references, promotional tone. Unable to find any secondary references to denote notability in google." If some good independent reliable sources are added to the article, then of course it should stay. But otherwise, sorry, it should go to Articles for Deletion debate. Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 16:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Velvet Elvis is ref'd, and is a reliable source. Additionally, these are considered independently-produced artistic works/publications, themselves. They were originally linked to the Rob Bell article, but because the series is owned by Flannel and not fully limited to Bell, Nooma became a separate article.--Lyonscc (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- On related note, please see active discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith (2nd nomination) Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 17:12, 10 December 2010 (UTC)