Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226ace549f7bdc9

Jump to content

Talk:N-flake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 0x0077BE in topic Terminology?

Terminology?

[edit]

The only sources that I can find for the word "polyflake" are one other wikipedia page that links back here, and 40-50 apparent mirrors and derivatives of this Wikipedia article. It kinda looks as if the term might have been invented for the article, in which case it probably shouldn't be introduced in bold in the intro, in a way that suggests that it might be a preexisting technical term.

"Sierpinski n-gon" does seem to be a loose descriptive term that sometimes get bandied about occasionally, in the expectation that a fractal-literate readership will be able to guess what's meant.

I'm not sure about "n-flake", though. The term doesn't seem to appear in any of the references cited by the article.

I'm also finding a few inconsistencies here. For example, there are a few flavors of these things. For example, consider the following 4 hexaflakes:
All of these are nominally "hexaflakes", but they are formed by different procedures. It's not clear how to distinguish between the flavors. For example, the standard procedure for the "hexaflake" (e.g. the first one here) as applied to squares generates just another square, but the "edge-centered" version with center polygons generates the Vicsek fractal:
However, the "scaling factor" identified on this page is inaccurate when using the "edge centered" version, and instead a different scaling factor is used:
For n = 4i+6 (for positive integers i), these two scaling factors are the same, but otherwise they are slightly different. Are these other shapes also Sierpinski n-gons? Just the 4i+6 ones? Needs to be clarified. Also, you can always inset a central polygon, but the scaling factor for the central polygon which has it share either an edge or a vertex with each of its neighbors is different from the scaling factor for the edge polygons, compare:
This is probably something we want to clarify in the article, assuming we can find some reliable sources that give a clearer definition. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 21:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply