Talk:Myrmecophily

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Myrmecophily/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 08:54, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: MisawaSakura (talk · contribs) 01:55, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Starting review. Results first look are impressive. MisawaSakura (talk) 01:55, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Images are good.MisawaSakura (talk) 02:08, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Earwig copy vio detector returns sky high score, see this . If it makes you log in or something, run it through the Earwig tool link on my talk page here: User_talk:MisawaSakura. MisawaSakura (talk) 02:08, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

That site states explicitly that it copied from us, naming Wikimedia and the CC-by license to state correctly that their copying was lawful. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Refs are high quality and consistently formatted. MisawaSakura (talk) 02:08, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I have no issues with the prose.MisawaSakura (talk) 02:08, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

This might even pass FA after it makes GA. My only quibble is the one copyvio hit. MisawaSakura (talk) 02:08, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

MisawaSakura: Many thanks. They copied from us, see above. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I didn't notice that. Sorry for the confusion. Great article!MisawaSakura (talk) 11:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)