Talk:Myrmecophagy
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Chiswick Chap in topic GA review
 | Myrmecophagy has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 27, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg)
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Myrmecophagy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 06:55, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: MisawaSakura (talk · contribs) 23:10, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Starting review. MisawaSakura (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Images - are good
- Noted, thanks.
- Images - are good
- Refs - high quality and good formatting, except ref 19, " pp. 172–." Shouldn't there be an ending page like the other refs with " pp."?
- Done.
- Refs - high quality and good formatting, except ref 19, " pp. 172–." Shouldn't there be an ending page like the other refs with " pp."?
- Copyvio - none, but note that same web site as before copied your article, haha.
...still looking over. MisawaSakura (talk)
- (The article was Myrmecophily.)
- Ref 14, it says "|pages=nwac174", what does nwac have to do with pages? Looks like a paste error as nwac is part of the doi. Also, in the body it's ref 14 and appears to the left of ref 12, but 12 should be before 14. MisawaSakura (talk) 23:24, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Reordered. The weird numbering is correct.
- Ref 14, it says "|pages=nwac174", what does nwac have to do with pages? Looks like a paste error as nwac is part of the doi. Also, in the body it's ref 14 and appears to the left of ref 12, but 12 should be before 14. MisawaSakura (talk) 23:24, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Prose - can't find anything wrong here, nice job! MisawaSakura (talk) 23:31, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- MisawaSakura: Thank you! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:19, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to help. MisawaSakura (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- It is not an error on our part. The identifier is for the article as a whole: it says on the first page "Natl Sci Rev, 2023, Vol. 10, nwac174". Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to help. MisawaSakura (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- MisawaSakura: Thank you! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:19, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Prose - can't find anything wrong here, nice job! MisawaSakura (talk) 23:31, 26 September 2025 (UTC)