Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21eb7950c011528

Jump to content

Talk:Myopia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Add A Fact: "2 hours outside reduces myopia risk in kids"

[edit]

I found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote below

Children should spend up to two hours a day outside to reduce their risk of myopia, or nearsightedness, according to a new consensus report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

The fact comes from the following source:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2024/10/07/myopia-prevention-outdoor-time-children/

Here is a wikitext snippet to use as a reference:

 {{Cite web |title=The Washington Post - Breaking news and latest headlines, U.S. news, world news, and video - The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2024/10/07/myopia-prevention-outdoor-time-children/ |website=Washington Post |access-date=2024-10-09 |language=en |first=Ian |date=2024-10-07|last=McMahan|quote=Children should spend up to two hours a day outside to reduce their risk of myopia, or nearsightedness, according to a new consensus report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.}} 

Additional comments from user: It looks like this new report could be good to add to the article. The "Society and culture" section mentions Taiwan's program to encourage 120 minutes of outdoor time, which is related to this new study.

This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension.

Cloud atlas (talk) 18:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026

[edit]

The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.

If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:

  1. Add yourself as a participant
  2. Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
  3. Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
  4. Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection

To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Overlap between 'Prevention and control' and 'Treatment' sections

[edit]

The 'Prevention and control' and 'Treatment' sections show considerable overlap of content and there is a case for amalgamating the two.

For example, under 'Prevention and control', we find "Many myopia treatment studies ... knowledge of treatments used." (my emphases) while under 'Treatment', we find "there is no known way of preventing myopia" (my emphasis).

Before proceeding with an amalgamation and a resolution (with the goal of improving a top-importance medicine article - see above), I invite comments from other editors.

--JMC (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply