Talk:Murphy Moose

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

--JP 21:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)The airspeed numbers need to be checked: KM/H and MPH do not agree. (Fixed 21 March 2006)Reply

Cheaper?

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Added the 'missing citations' template to this article, as apart from the official website no sources are given, and especially the 'cheaper to operate then the Beaver' seems a bit biased to me as long as no other source has been provided. --Antheii (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Even if it is true, it is unsourced and an unfair comparison anyway - the two aircraft are not in the same weight or powerplant class. I have removed it. - Ahunt (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Murphy Moose

Cheaper?