Talk:Mule (nomad)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SonOfYoutubers talk 18:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a nomad known as "Mule" sued to protect the "sacred relationship between man and horse to travel together with reverence and respect for this beautiful place in which we all reside called Earth"?

• Source: "An activist and wanderer known across California as “Mule Man” says the CHP violated his right to intrastate roadside travel and his “ages-old nomadic way of life” when he was arrested near Paso Robles in 2020.

The complaint says that Sears seeks to “protect this ages-old nomadic way of life and the sacred relationship between man and horse to travel together with reverence and respect for this beautiful place in which we all reside called Earth.”"

The Tribune

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Royal 10

Created by Thriley (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 177 past nominations.

Thriley (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC).

• Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks mostly good. My main concern is that the full quote does not appear in the article, only a portion of it, and there's two bare URLs. Also, is he "Mule" or "Mule Man" like the source says? Add the quote, fix the refs and it should be good to go. @Thriley: BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:56, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

• Thank you for your review. I’ll be fixing it up in the next day or so. Thriley (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

• @Thriley: Have you addressed the above concerns, and is this ready for a re-review? If yes, can you please inform the reviewer. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

@BeanieFan11: I have now fixed up the article. Thriley (talk) 21:53, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

• BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:04, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Outcome?

Hi - well done on an interesting article. What was the outcome of his lawsuit? Blackballnz (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2025 (UTC)