Talk:Muffin Break
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by Panamitsu in topic On Undue Weight
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country?
[edit]How is the country Canada if they don't have any presence there? Everett3 (talk) 01:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I've clarified this in the article. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Content on Animal Welfare added to pressurize the business
[edit]Dear Admin, I request the removal of the content under the "Animal Welfare" section, as it has been added with the intent to misrepresent the brand and pressure the business through misleading claims. This content is not factual and serves to tarnish the brand's reputation. Thank you for your assistance. Sivasdad (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Done. That reeked of undue weight. AtlasDuane (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
On Undue Weight
[edit]I would like to tell people currently embroiled in an edit war, that wikipedia prefers a Neutral point of view. Over half the article's content is about why the business is terrible, which isn't a good article. AtlasDuane (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- To prevent any further issue, please see the article I have created, Criticism of Muffin Break. AtlasDuane (talk) 08:52, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- I actually think creating a separate article for the criticism makes the POV problem worse, because if that article is just titled "criticism", then only criticism can be put into that article. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)