Talk:Mueller report

Title

Yes, I know about OTHERTHINGS, but sometimes we should just use common sense.

• Mueller report is not fully capitalized
• Durham Report is

The latter makes sense. I suggest we do that here. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Moved to current title. rootsmusic (talk) 05:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Looks like Durham Report is about a 19th-century Canadian document. It seems like it's pretty consistently capitalized, so it might be considered a proper noun. I'm not familiar with the subject at all though, so I'm not sure.

If you're talking about the similarly named report in the Trump-Russia investigation, that article is actually titled Durham special counsel investigation. That page uses lowercase when it mentions "Durham report", so we are consistent within this topic at least. –IagoQnsi (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Senate Intelligence Committee Snippet

Why are we presenting the commentary from Heinrich, Feinstien, Wyden, Harris and Bennet as if its a conclusion from the entire Committee? Additionally, this inclusion would appear to violate WP:PRIMARY. It should be removed. MasterBlasterofBarterTown (talk) 19:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

AI dashboard of the Mueller Report

I am a retired professor specializing in applied AI, and I've developed a system called Story Analyzer (see https://storyanalyzer.org/) which uses natural language processing and data visualization to produce dashboards of complex narrative text. Please check out this dashboard of the Mueller Report at https://storyanalyzer.org/muellerreport/.

I think this would be a useful addition to the article. Mikemitri (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

No, we cannot use your website as an external link. See WP:EL. MrOllie (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)