Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d71ca3a2b0ecd

Jump to content

Talk:Mucoactive agent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Giocarsa in topic Mucokinetics

If expectorants should not be confused with mucolytic agents, then why does "expectorants" redirect to "mucolytic agents"? I myself am not that knowledgeable in pharmacology so I do not dare to change anything. Simonsimpson 08:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Expectorants do not increase mucus but instead reduce the viscosity and adhesiveness of the secretions. True, expectorants should not be confused with mucolytics, but they are similar in their pharmacologic effect. Guaifenesin is an expectorant and should be removed from this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.189.18.91 (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is confusing (especially for a layman like me) I searched for "Expectorant" and it redirected to "Cough Medicine". Thinking that it maybe linked to a more full explanation, I clicked on the link for "Expectorants" (note the plural ending) within that article and it redirected me to here... and this article says that Mucolytic agents shouldn't be confused with expectorants! Am I alone in thinking this looks sloppy? I'm not sure how to do redirects, so I'll leave this amusing scenario to someone with more expertise. 138.163.0.43 (talk) 20:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

agreed! I was looking up "DM" and cough syrups and related stuff, and the "expectorant" link got me here... and this article is clinical/technical I am confused now as to what mucolytics are vs. expectorants. 199.214.26.41 (talk) 16:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citations Please

[edit]

This article is severely lacks citation, and some of the information is just wrong. Robitussin is not the same as codeine! I am also removing the reference to expectorants increasing mucus production as there is no citation. CelticLabyrinth (talk) 03:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why no herbs?

[edit]

This article defines mucokinetics, and therefore by implication expectorants, as a class of drugs. It completely ignores the fact that there are many herbal expectorants. I actually came to this article in the hope of finding a list of herbal expectorants, or at least a link to such a list. Brumel (talk) 10:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mucokinetics

[edit]

I am no expert but I remember reading of a research project suggesting that OTC mucokinetics are no better than placebos. Perhaps an expert could contribute the appropriate reference(s).Giocarsa (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply