Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please keep all discussions civil and on-topic. Uncivil discussion including inappropriate behavior and language will not be responded to and deleted from the discussion.
So, we are here today to discuss whether or not Mr. Skin meets the qualifications to be included as an article on Wikipedia. IMHO no it does not, while Mr. Skin himself has appeared on The Howard Stern Show, Opie and Anthony and other radio and television programs but respectfully this is simply a blaten promotion of a PFA (Pay for access) website with no notable material that makes it unique. Further there is a question of whether Wikipedia should include and promote a website which openly violates U.S. Copyright laws and the Berne Union and Universal Copyright Convention by using video clips which have not been duly licensed by the movie studios for public performance. It has been stated openly by company officials at MrSkin.com that "We use the clips and the movie studios just simply tolerate what we do". It has been my personal experience that motion picture and television studios usually do not license clips which contain nudity as an internal policy or only license clips to a pay site under a licensing agreement which benefits not only the website by also the studio which provides the content to the website. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
