Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
While this almost 100-year old source describes a Mount Northrop, I can't find any contemporary source which names it. Perhaps Mount Northrop has been renamed?– Gilliam (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Just for a kick I've submitted a request to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names for this. I found a few references to the name and location from back in the late 1800s/early 1900s but it seems to have disappeared after that. I'll post here if I get a response. Nsteffel (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Warren Upham's book clearly is a reliable and independent secondary source. The age of a source is no more relevant to its existence than the age of a mountain. Here, there is a source, and no sources are given to dispute the name. Personal suspicion is not evidence. Kablammo (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply