Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2402f088deaa9fe

Jump to content

Talk:Moritz Seider

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Servite et contribuere in topic RFC - Should we use the nickname Mo?

How has no one updated this?

[edit]

How has no one updated this with his rockin Detroit stats? He's a superstar for sure. Also, I don't see a rookie of the year in DEL for 2018-19? I read that he was. Go Wings! 69.174.135.250 (talk) 02:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

RFC - Should we use the nickname Mo?

[edit]

Typically I would just remove this nickname per MOS:HYPOCORISM, but I decided that this might be a different case. If you look at my recent editing history I have long been removing nicknames that don't match MOS:HYPOCORISM. But I decided that since he is officially listed as Moritz Seider instead of Mo Seider, there might be reason to keep this nickname. Should this be mentioned in the opening? Above the InfoBox? Or not at all? There are some cases where a common Hypocorism could be used. The MrBeast article is one of these where consensus was reached to use "Jimmy". Another example is James Anderson (cricketer) who is commonly called "Jimmy Anderson" hence the nickname "Jimmy" is acceptable. I want to know what other editors think about this. What should be done?

* A It should be included in the name in the opening and at the the top of the InfoBox
* B It should be included at the top of the InfoBox but not the name in the opening
* C It shouldn't be included in the opening name or the InfoBox
* D It should be included in the opening name but not the InfoBox

For those new, I might suggest getting experience by seeing arguments on a similar RFC here: Talk:MrBeast/Archive 3#RfC "Jimmy Donaldson". If this seems a controversial suggestion by me, please let me know. Thank you Servite et contribuere (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply