Talk:Moreland Act
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
404 in reference 1 ... I don't know how to fix this. " /a/research/res_topics_legal_govguide_committees.shtml was not found" --BenTremblay (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Moreland Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515195233/http://www.archives.nysed.gov/a/research/res_topics_legal_govguide_committees.shtml to http://www.archives.nysed.gov/a/research/res_topics_legal_govguide_committees.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130827124416/http://publiccorruption.moreland.ny.gov/ to http://publiccorruption.moreland.ny.gov/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515195233/http://www.archives.nysed.gov/a/research/res_topics_legal_govguide_committees.shtml to http://www.archives.nysed.gov/a/research/res_topics_legal_govguide_committees.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Start class October 21, 2025
[edit]I have added a significant amount of content over the past 2 days, so I'm classifying this as Start class. Some possible future additions:
- Transcribing the full list of commissions I have (will take time)
- More on the specific amendments
- How Moreland Commissions function at law
- What Moreland Commission reports look like
- Whether the "permanent agency" referenced was ever created
Ilikepie2221 (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected, closed by Launchballer (talk) 01:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Original: ... that the Moreland Act is a New York law that was actually proposed by Governor Charles Evans Hughes?
- ALT1: ... that Governor William Sulzer established seven Moreland Act commissions before he was impeached after ten months in office?
- Source: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1956&context=plr (PDF page 6, marked as page 5)
- Reviewed:
Ilikepie2221 (talk) 21:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC).
Article looks ok from a quick review, long enough, no BLP issues, neutral enough. Earwig turned up the blockquote, which is PD obviously, but nothing else, and my spot checks didn't turn up any CLOP issues. The source seems basically reliable though a PhD thesis is not ideal. The issue is the hook fails DYKINT. Every law is proposed by someone and I fail to see why it being proposed by a governor would make it noteworthy. Also, the source we're using here is not cited in the article for this. Any alternatives? PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The source is in the article (just formatted with author and title) but I take the point about the hook not being that interesting. I've added an ALT1 proposal that is more interesting. Ilikepie2221 (talk) 00:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- That one is better, though if you could work it in that it was to investigate his political opponents that would make it more interesting. But as is this is fine.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- That one is better, though if you could work it in that it was to investigate his political opponents that would make it more interesting. But as is this is fine.
- The source is in the article (just formatted with author and title) but I take the point about the hook not being that interesting. I've added an ALT1 proposal that is more interesting. Ilikepie2221 (talk) 00:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, checking this again, source does not say he was in office for "ten months", though the main thrust of the hook is supported. Could you add a source that does, User:Ilikepie2221? PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ilikepie2221:
This sourcing issue needs to be addressed in both the hook and the article before this can be promoted. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ilikepie2221: has not edited in the last two weeks. I plan on closing this in 24 hours if they haven't returned by then.--Launchballer 01:29, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ilikepie2221: