Talk:Moravian Church
Add topic| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add settlement in Nazareth, PA in 1740, one year prior to Bethlehem, falling out with Whitfield, retaking Nazareth when Whitfield went broke.
|
Does this sentence make sense to you? Some proofreading, then editing is required.
[edit]"Until that stalwarts exanteos in New York that September 1740 they led him through the unbroken wilderness to Shekomeko where a Moravian mission was established and the two Indians chiefs were converted to the Moravian faith."
US Centric
[edit]Good article, but much too US-Centric. There are 50,000 Moravians in the US, but 700,000 world wide, due to successful missions over the last 270 years. Check out their site, and follow the links to some of the international churches.
quality concerns
[edit]i am confused by the amount of bulletpoint list of terms with no definition or explanation, and bolded headings for subjects that either do not relate at all to their body or have already been covered under other parts of the article. the "goals of the moravian mission" section is especially confusing -- there is one goal listed and the rest of the list seems to just be a series of publications? there's an extra 'references' section that doesn't follow wikipedia formatting, as well. i don't mean to directly accuse anyone but it seems that a significant portion of this article is ai-generated, with little to no human revision. ~2026-10563-10 (talk) 23:51, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
"Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine [sic]"
[edit]Why "[sic]"?
It's the historical way of writing the word. Is it common to add [sic] for historic entities that are using the originally / historically correct spelling of their name? The dewiki article does not add a [sic] behind the word. So if German does not consider the word to be incorrectly spelled then why does English think that this historic German word is incorrectly spelled? By that logic Ye Olde Trip to Jerusalem should have [sic] behind its name for using archaic words and spelling. Nakonana (talk) 16:40, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Top-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Czech Republic articles
- Mid-importance Czech Republic articles
- All WikiProject Czech Republic pages
- C-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class European history articles
- Unknown-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists