Talk:Morab

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060504080704/http://www.equiworld.net/Breeds/morab/history.htm and https://web.archive.org/web/20070226203740/http://www.morab.com/morab_beginnings.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Is there a recognised breed standard?

Who keeps the studbook? Where is the breed standard? Are there any Halter (horse show)? Where are the stallions? Who is responsible for livestock branding? The existence of this horse breed is unclear. If it is just a private registration database, its relevance is unclear. Best Minoo (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

@Minoo: No branding with this breed. I added to the article information about the registry/ies which should answer several of your questions. After spending quite a bit of time on this article, I found information about Morabs in the Bonnie Hendricks book. Though I added it to the references, I didn't go much deeper. The book, available to read online at Open Library, has much to say about the description of the breed. Maybe you would consider enhancing the "Characteristics" section with information from the Hendricks book.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 03:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I was just wondering where the standard is written and who is responsible for maintaining it. If there isn't one, where do those books get their breed information from? It is not uncommon for domestic animals of different breeds to be crossed. However, this alone is not an indicator of a new breed. Best Minoo (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

The Hendricks book was written 30 years ago, but if you look at the sources I’ve added to the article, you’ll see that Morab registries and Morab × Morab breeding efforts have existed for many decades prior to that. I share your skepticism about standalone articles for crossbreeds on Wikipedia — I was prepared to nominate this one for deletion until I dug deeper. What changed my mind was realizing that, although the last remaining registry still accepts first-generation crosses, these crosses have been made and documented in serious breeding programs for over a century.

I’ve dealt with this issue before — crossbreeds and “new” breeds often walk a fine line between notability and promotional fluff. After a few battles over similar articles, I communicated with an editor who’s worked on horse breed content since the early 2000s. Their take was that if we don’t give this kind of content a proper home, someone will inevitably wedge it into less appropriate places. So unless the breed is extremely obscure or clearly non-notable, the best approach is to keep the article and improve it — grounding it in reliable sources and presenting the facts as clearly as possible.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 15:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

... “new” breeds often walk a fine line between notability and promotional fluff. This is so true. Thank you for clarification. Best Minoo (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Another reason that changed my mind about horse crossbreeds is the German method of breeds (at least warmbloods or sport horses). Their breeds are named after a region (each region having its own registry) but horses are accepted based off their performance record and conformation regardless of their ancestry. There is no requirement that their sires and dams are also in the registry to which they are applying. It was a foreign concept for me, but it seems to be a method that is spreading to other countries and their "sport horse" breeding. It is also a system which reduces issues from shrinking gene pools.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 00:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

References