Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a256a8b81d7fc892

Jump to content

Talk:Moody chart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 193.144.52.244 in topic moody friction factor

including the moody chart

[edit source]

I believe it would be helpful to include the moody chart in this article however I have yet to find one explicitly released under the GNU license.

I would make one in MATLAB, however that may take some time as I am not very proficient in making pretty graphs yet. If anyone can, could they upload one they have made or found one under the GNU that can be included? powerfool 12:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I can provide an Octave script (it's similar to Matlab) to compute the chart (solving the nonlinear equation with Newton-Raphson's method) and also to make the plot. But I'm not aware if it is OK to put such a code here. May be one can put it elsewhere, and then put a link here. Mariostorti 16:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

moody friction factor

[edit source]

there is an article under moody friction factor, perhaps it should be redirected/merged into this article?powerfool 12:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

There is a mistake in the first formula of the article. There is an extra "4". The equation as it is now is for the Fanning friction factor, which is four times the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.144.52.244 (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notation for logarithms

[edit source]

I think we should use log_10 instead of plainly log. We could use also lg, but I think that log_10 is more explicit. Mariostorti 15:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply