Talk:Monu Kumar

Requested move 20 November 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

---

Monu Kumar (cricketer) → Monu Kumar – Base title is protected from creation. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 20:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Lugnuts: Page Monu Kumar is protected from creation and there seems to have been events there. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

I know it's protected - hence why I asked for it to be moved, as I could not create it at the non-disambig title! I'd assume commonsense and WP:NOTBUREAU would apply as there are no other articles with this title... Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. If there are issues (of whatever nature) preventing the article's main title header from appearing without a parenthetical qualifier, these should be discussed, or at least mentioned on this talk page. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
• Strong support per nom. Per the guideline at WP:PRECISE, I am not understanding why this was moved to full discussion, regardless of the move destination being creation protected. If this article ends up having the same issues with whatever page was at the protected title, it would then be deleted in turn, but preemptively preventing that makes no sense. Steel1943 (talk) 23:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
• Support – disambiguation not needed – per WP:PRECISE. CookieMonster755 𝚨-𝛀 23:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
• Support - Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
• Support per nom. I'm a bit perplexed as to why such a straightforward move request has now taken more than a week to carry out. IgnorantArmies (talk) 17:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.