Talk:Monogenism
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Mooonswimmer in topic A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
Problematic second paragraph in "Mid-century contention in the United Kingdom" section
[edit]I added the appropriate tags to problematic and clumsily written content. Feel free to remove them after improving the paragraph and dealing with issues such as the colloquial words usage, the strange presuppositions, the lack of sources and citations, etc. The particular concerns were included in the 'reason' section of the tags themselves. The text itself was left intact so users can see (and improve, if possible) this low quality paragraph.
Seguro64 (talk) 19:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note that Seguro64 was blocked for sockpuppetry. --Rsk6400 (talk) 08:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa
[edit]A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa. Interesting and relevant recent study published in Nature that suggests that the emergence of humans occurred at different locations and periods throughout Africa. Mooonswimmer 19:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)