Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225e01b4845bde9

Jump to content

Talk:Monogenic system

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 67.198.37.16 in topic Toward a less technical definition

Toward a less technical definition

[edit]

I was trying to find a less technical definition. The problem appears to be that monogenic is just a term grafted onto a mathematical circumstance, and has little independent reality.

Lanczos (1986, p. 30) calls applied forces of this kind monogenic (‘monogenic’ for ‘single origin’) as against polygenic. Goldstein et al (2002) follow him; and I shall also adopt these terms.

The Variational Principles of Mechanics, Cornelius Lanczos, page 30:

It seems desirable to have a distinctive name for forces which are derivable from a scalar quantity, irrespective of whether they are conservative or not. This book adopts the name "monogenic" (which means "single-generated") as a distinguishing name for this category of forces ... [others are] "polygenic".

MaxEnt 00:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Monogenic is a synonym for monic e.g. a monic polynomial. Mathematicians like the word, Lanczos probably picked it up from them. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply