Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a404de41bb27689d

Jump to content

Talk:Monkey hate/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 25 days ago by OpalYosutebito in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 17:01, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) 21:41, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply


Maybe the lede could be expanded more? Maybe add something about macaques or COVID-19? Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Thepharoah17 done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:37, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also there are two sources that I see in refideas. Do you want to add them to the article? Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'll add them when I get home - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:44, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm currently adding to the background section - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:50, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sources 4 and 12 make no mention of "Million Tears." Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:05, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I added a ref call to source 1 - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:46, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source 16 makes no mention of "Adriana Orme" and "Holly LeGresley." Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Moved ref call - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source 3 is a dead link but I'll assume WP:AGF. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:16, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Spotcheck per source

[edit]