Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a223c995fde4e6b0

Jump to content

Talk:Mold

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by MagnusVandbakk in topic Definition of Mold

Definition of Mold

[edit]

The current definition is very imprecise and only describes what a lay-person might observe when seeing food beginning to decay. The presence of Hyphae, for example, is a characteristic of all fungi. Whilst this may not be of critical importance here - we can after all have articles about every-day things - it becomes more significant when the term is used elsewhere as in Medicinal molds. In the latter case, this generates a very substantial and very unclear overlap with Medicinal mushrooms. This is a mess that urgently needs resolution. What would be a good start is a clear statement identifying which Phyla are considered to encompass the Molds from which it would be possible to identify all the rest. These won't of course be "Mushrooms" (again a non-taxonomic term) because there will be many ascomycetes and a whole range of fungi not producing classical mushroom or toadstool spore bodies. I haven't the mycological knowledge or skill to sort these out, but I hope that there is an editor out there who can point this article in the right direction.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not all fungi have hyphae – yeasts do not, which is what distinguishes them from molds. I don't think a phylogenetic approach will work as molds, like mushrooms, are a non-taxonomic (polyphyletic) group. But I see you're right about the current definition. I remember hearing that molds were filamentous fungi that lacked macroscopic fruiting bodies, but I don't have a reference for that, and in any case it's clearly an imperfect definition as Aspergillus nidulans, Hypocrea jecorina, and surely many other important molds would fail it. It might be that there is no authoritative definition out there as "mold" is, like "worm", a non-technical word that has been used since human's understanding of biology was rudimentary.
I see what you mean about Medicinal mushrooms and Medicinal molds. Perhaps they should just be merged into a new "Medicinal fungi" article? That would eliminate a lot of overlap, as well as provide a sensible home for the section on yeasts, currently out-of-place in Medicinal molds. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 23:38, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I feel like every definition of mold I've seen is super ambiguous and never precise. I was wondering if any fungi that reproduce asexually without fruiting bodies are considered as mold? So basically "hyphomycetes" would be considered the "mold" group? How do you think? MagnusVandbakk (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I want to add a text.

[edit]

They do extracellular digestion. 103.80.172.165 (talk) 12:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Every fungi does extracellular digestion. It is part of the definition of fungi. MagnusVandbakk (talk) 15:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Food Production: oncom

[edit]

The Food Production section says Neurospora sitophila is used to produce oncom, but the oncom page says it is Neurospora intermedia. The Neurospora sitophila page also does not mention oncom. I think this is a mistake?
Dazmax (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply