Talk:Moland, Minnesota
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Elm-39 in topic Untitled
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Why did you do this to this page? this is a perfectly fine page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moland freak (talk • contribs) 16:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- CSD A7, what I should have recommended to begin with:
- An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. A7 applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on. A7 does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion.
Do you have a passion? well, I do. It is the small towns of Minnesota. The only reason I joined Wiki is because of my passion for these towns. Do you have a problem with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moland freak (talk • contribs) 17:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Personally, I find that the first sentence is all that is needed. In fact, taking just that first sentence, combined with the sources, and maybe a picture of the part of a map, then this article could stand on it's own fairly well. At least, for a little while.
- Speaking of which, putting up a map might even get this article on Google Maps. Articles about small towns like this tend to. This article just seems so bare and unnecessary as-is. Elm-39 (talk) 18:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)