Talk:Mohan Deep

Clean up

Maybe moved from AfC too soon. Though it is claimed Deep is controversial and publicly criticized, there's not much in the article to prove that, so far. Largely it has been written promotionally and one-sidedly. I've removed some of the excess/unsourced content, but left the "essay like" clean-up tag on the article until it's improved further. Sionk (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

• I have asked the creator here --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

• And ya, I added those templates! I think, article layout should be like this --Tito Dutta (contact) 14:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Titoda, I'm sorry for the delay. Have been working on two articles but I returned to see my article I found that it still has some questions about being 'publicly criticized'. I can cite the articles that have criticized him. Should I just cite them or give excerpts from them? And if I give reference, should I also quote from his answers? I don't really accept the term 'unsourced content' as I have access to over 50 articles. Should I cite more sources? I have tried, in the past, to clean up the article and you have helped me. I don't understand what more can I do. And, this is my article about Mohan Deep. How can this article invite libel when his own books didn't? I'll appreciate your help. Farida F.Balsara (talk) 04:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Verifiable content

Can someone help? Every citing and reference I've given in this article is from published material. As newspaper articles and stories, published over the years are all scanned and made available on the same web site, they appear to be from one web site. But they are from different sources. Isn't that enough?

Farida.balsara (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)